Endometriosis, Hypermobility, and the Pain That Isn’t Coming From Your Uterus

Jacques Courseault, MD, CAQSM, FAAPMR · The Fascia Institute and Treatment Center®

Most women who come to us have the same story. Years of pain. A long wait before anyone took it seriously. Then a name: endometriosis. Often surgery, too.

And then the pain came back. Or it never really left. And nobody knew what to try next.

This article pulls apart two questions. Doctors mix them up all the time.

Both can be true at once. You can have real endometriosis, proven by biopsy. And most of today’s pain can still be coming from your belly wall, your pelvic floor muscles, or your low back.

The research on this is much stronger than most patients are told. And it changes what should happen next.

Our approach is the same for everyone. It has two steps. First, find the real source of the pain. The exact tissue. Not a general area, and not a guess. Second, find the right tool to fix it. Then use the tools in the right order. Most people who reach us never got step one. That is why step two never worked. You cannot pick the right tool if nobody found the target.

01 · The Disease

What endometriosis actually is

Endometriosis is when tissue like the lining of your uterus grows outside the uterus. It usually grows on the lining of the pelvis, on the ovaries, or behind the uterus. Sometimes it grows on the bowel, the bladder, the breathing muscle under your ribs, or the belly wall.

This tissue feeds on estrogen. And it causes inflammation.

Doctors used to treat it as a local problem in the pelvis. Most experts now describe it another way. They call it a whole-body disease. Long-lasting, inflammatory, and driven by estrogen.¹

The World Health Organization thinks about 10% of women of childbearing age have it. That is roughly 190 million people.² Be careful with any single number, though. US surveys say about 6%. Insurance records say about 2%. Surgery studies say more. That gap is not a mistake. It shows how much endometriosis never gets found.³

Where it comes from is still an open question

The leading idea is called retrograde menstruation. Some period blood flows backward through the tubes and lands in the pelvis.

There is a problem with that idea. Backward flow happens in most women who ovulate. Only about one in ten gets endometriosis. And it cannot explain disease in the chest, or on the breathing muscle, or in women with no uterus. Several other ideas have evidence behind them too. There is probably more than one cause.

It is also a scarring disease — and that matters here

A review of 142 studies found that scarring is not a side effect of endometriosis. It is central to it.⁴ Cells change into a type that lays down collagen and pulls tissue tight. The pelvis ends up stiff, tethered, and scarred.

That is a connective tissue problem. It is one reason endometriosis and fascia pain are so easy to mix up. And one reason they happen together so often. Scar tissue in the pelvis does not care where the gynecology label ends and the muscle label begins.

02 · Diagnosis

How doctors diagnose it now — and what changed

For years, the rule was that only surgery could prove endometriosis. A surgeon had to look inside with a camera. That rule is gone. In 2026, all three major guideline groups agree.

• · ESHRE, 2022. Surgery is no longer the gold standard. You can start with imaging and treatment, or you can start with surgery. Neither path has proven better. Surgery makes sense when the scan is negative and treatment has not worked.⁸
• · NICE, updated November 2024. Every woman with suspected endometriosis should be offered an internal ultrasound, ordered by her regular doctor. And this, in plain words: do not rule out endometriosis just because the exam and the ultrasound look normal.⁹
• · ACOG, 2026. This is ACOG’s first full guideline on diagnosing endometriosis. Your symptoms and your exam are enough to start medicine. You do not need surgery first. Ultrasound comes first for imaging. MRI is for planning surgery on deep disease.¹⁰

This is real progress. Making women earn a diagnosis through surgery was a big reason the average wait is still 5 to 11 years.⁵

But a normal scan does not mean you are fine

This is the part that keeps getting dropped. And it matters most to the women reading this.

Ultrasound and MRI are good at finding cysts on the ovaries. They are good at finding large, deep growths. They are bad at finding the flat, shallow kind on the surface of the pelvic lining. That shallow kind is the most common kind.

The Cochrane review looked at this closely. Ultrasound found ovarian cysts about 93% of the time. It found deep disease about 79% of the time. But no scan of any type has ever been shown to find shallow surface disease.¹¹ Even the best recent study, done at an expert center, caught only about half of shallow cases. The authors said it plainly. A normal scan does not prove you do not have it.¹²

Blood tests and saliva tests

There is still no blood test that can diagnose endometriosis. Cochrane reviewed 141 studies covering more than 15,000 women. None of the tests worked well enough. CA-125, the one doctors order most, caught only about 40% of cases at the usual cutoff.¹³ ACOG’s 2026 guideline says not to use blood, urine, or tissue markers to diagnose endometriosis. That includes CA-125.¹⁰

Saliva tests are getting attention. A large French study reported very high accuracy. One test is now covered in France under a special program. But it has no FDA approval. Researchers are still testing whether it actually helps patients in real practice. And it cannot tell you where the disease is, how bad it is, or rule anything else out. We watch this closely. We do not treat it as an answer yet.

Words you may see on your report

Two systems are worth knowing. IDEA is the standard checklist and vocabulary for endometriosis ultrasound. It is why a modern scan report is organized and easy to compare.¹⁴ #Enzian describes where the disease sits, area by area. It works for both scans and surgery. And it handles deep disease better than the older ASRM staging system.¹⁵

03 · Symptoms

The symptoms — and why the stage doesn’t tell you how much it hurts

ACOG says to suspect endometriosis when any one of these is present, whether or not it follows your cycle: pelvic pain, painful periods, pain with sex, painful urination, painful bowel movements, or trouble getting pregnant along with any of those.¹⁰

Stage tells you how hard the surgery is, not how much it hurts

This is one of the best-proven facts in the field. It is also one of the least shared.

• · In 1,054 women having their first surgery, the link between stage and symptoms was weak and inconsistent.¹⁶
• · A recent review of many studies found that pain levels are not tied to stage at all.¹⁸
• · In 52 women having surgery for suspected endometriosis, pain scores were the same whether or not they had endometriosis. They were the same across stages, too. What did track with pain was the number of immune cells in the pelvic fluid.¹⁹
• · Brain scans show the same thing from another angle. Women who had endometriosis and pain showed changes in several brain areas. Women who had endometriosis and no pain showed none of those changes. The brain followed the pain, not the disease.²⁰

04 · The Hypermobile Body

Endometriosis and hypermobility: what the research really shows

Many of the women we see for pelvic and belly pain are hypermobile. That means their joints move farther than most people’s joints do.

It runs on a scale. Some people are bendy with no problems at all. Some have hypermobility spectrum disorder, or HSD. Some have hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, or hEDS.

We are going to be careful here. This is an area where confident claims run far ahead of the evidence.

What is solid: hypermobile women have a lot of pelvic and period trouble

This part of the research is strong. It deserves more attention than it gets.

• · 386 women with hEDS were studied at a French expert center. They filled out forms and were examined in person by a senior gynecologist. Heavy bleeding, 76%. Painful periods, 72%. Painful sex, 43%. And about a third said their hEDS symptoms got worse around every period.²¹
• · In 82 women with joint hypermobility: painful periods 82.9%. Heavy or irregular bleeding in about half. Painful sex or vulva pain 31.7%. And poor scar healing after a C-section or episiotomy in 46.1%.²²
• · One study compared 60 hypermobile women to 60 matched controls. Urine leaking, 73.3% versus 48.3%. The hypermobile women also had worse prolapse on exam, and worse quality of life in every area measured.²³ One other study found no link, so this is strong but not unanimous.²⁴
• · Across the research, prolapse in EDS runs 13% to 75%. Urine leaking, 38% to 60%. Pelvic pain, 13% to 75%. Painful sex, 30% to 77%.²⁵ The ranges are wide because the studies are small and done differently. But the direction is clear.
• · Prolapse in a child, a man, or a woman who has never given birth is actually part of the official hEDS checklist.²⁶

So if you are hypermobile and your periods are brutal, sex hurts, and your pelvic floor does not work right — that is a known pattern. It is not in your head. And you do not need an endometriosis diagnosis to make it real.

What is truly unsettled: whether endometriosis itself is more common

The two best studies point in opposite directions. We would rather tell you that than pick the one we like.

Two other numbers sit in between. A 1995 study of 41 women at an EDS clinic found 27%.²⁸ A 2025 online survey of about 3,400 people who said they had hEDS found 18.5%.²⁹ Neither one confirmed the diagnoses. Both drew from people who sought them out. Those are not real rates.

There are two claims we will not repeat, because we traced them and they do not hold up. One says that “60% of women with stage IV endometriosis are hypermobile.” That comes from a single paper in a journal outside this field, with suspiciously round numbers and no control group. The other says that “6 to 23% of people with EDS have endometriosis.” There is no original source for it at all.

What is an honest guess

The biology lines up in an interesting way. Endometriosis growths are built by cells that lay down collagen and pull it tight, driven by a signal called TGF-beta.⁴ Skin cells from people with hEDS and HSD act like those same cells. They also break down the tissue around them too fast. And their blood carries measurable pieces of broken-down connective tissue.^30,31 Human fascia cells change how much collagen they make, depending on hormone levels.³² Estrogen makes tendons and ligaments looser. Joint looseness shifts across the menstrual cycle.

All of that is real. But nobody has studied endometriosis growths in hEDS patients. hEDS has no known gene and no proven TGF-beta problem. And hypermobility was left out of every large genetic study of endometriosis. The shared-collagen story is a reasonable idea that people are working on. It is not a finding. We will not present it as one.

Mast cells: be careful here

Mast cells are immune cells that release histamine. Inside endometriosis growths, they are well documented. There are more of them, they are more active, and they sit right next to nerve fibers. The highest counts are in deep growths, which are the most painful kind.³³ That part is solid.

Saying that a whole-body condition called mast cell activation syndrome, or MCAS, links endometriosis and hypermobility is a different claim. Right now that claim is being challenged hard. Several papers from allergy specialists in 2025 and 2026 found no evidence that MCAS is more common in hEDS or POTS. One review found that not a single study had properly diagnosed MCAS using set criteria alongside POTS or EDS.³⁴ The famous papers behind the hEDS-POTS-MCAS “triad” are opinion reviews. They did not count anything.³⁵ We treat mast cell symptoms when we see them. We will not build a diagnosis on a triad the research does not currently support.

Dysautonomia and POTS

POTS means your heart races when you stand up, along with other signs that your nervous system is not regulating well. The best data comes from a specialty center. Among 1,322 women seen for POTS, 17.3% had endometriosis. That was higher than the general population. It was also higher than the 10.2% in their own comparison group, who tested negative for POTS. In about two-thirds of the women with both, endometriosis came first.³⁶

A separate survey looked at people whose POTS started in childhood. Endometriosis showed up in 8.9%, which is not higher than average. But 72% said their POTS got worse around their periods.³⁷ That was a young group, where endometriosis is probably still undiagnosed.

The one thing both conditions clearly share

Both endometriosis and hEDS are strongly linked to a nervous system that has learned to turn up the volume on pain.^38,39 In 150 adults with hEDS or HSD, only three things predicted it: fatigue, pain, and heart-related dysautonomia.⁴⁰

This is the most solid link between the two. And it has a real consequence, which we come back to in section 09. A high pain-sensitivity score before surgery predicts pain that lasts after surgery.⁴¹

05 · The Mix-Up

The pain that gets blamed on endometriosis — but isn’t

This is the heart of this article. Pain in the belly wall, the pelvic floor, and the low back gets blamed on endometriosis all the time. Much of the time it is coming from muscle and fascia instead. And that changes everything about how to treat it.

Two words first. Fascia is the connective tissue that wraps and links your muscles and organs. Myofascial pain means pain coming from muscle and fascia.

The numbers

• · The cleanest study. Researchers examined three groups. 18 women with biopsy-proven endometriosis and pain. 11 women with pelvic pain whose surgery found no endometriosis. And 20 women with no pain. Skin that hurt to light touch: 83%, 82%, and 15%. Tender muscle knots: 94% and 91% in the two pain groups. The muscle findings followed the pain, not the disease.⁷
• · In endometriosis specifically. Of 175 women with endometriosis, 48% had muscle and fascia pelvic pain on exam. Those women had worse endometriosis pain scores, worse quality of life in every area, and higher pain-sensitivity scores.⁴²
• · In everyone with pelvic symptoms. Doctors checked the pelvic floor muscles of 833 new patients by hand. 85% had muscle pain. Half of those were severe.⁴³ When clinics check everybody, instead of only the women who complain, the numbers land at the high end of a 14% to 78% range.⁴⁴
• · The belly wall’s share. Reviews estimate that up to 20% of “unexplained” belly pain actually comes from the belly wall itself.⁴⁵ The research describes this pain as one that gets misread as an organ problem. And it lists endometriosis as one of the things it gets confused with.⁴⁶

And after surgery

• · In one trial, some women got real surgery and some got fake surgery, and nobody knew which. Real surgery worked better. But about 20% of women got no relief at all. And the fake surgery helped about 30% of women, no matter how bad their disease was.⁶
• · In 176 women followed 2 to 5 years after expert surgery, 36% needed another operation. When surgeons went back in, they found endometriosis in only 68% of them. About a third of repeat surgeries for returning pain found no endometriosis at all.⁴⁷
• · Most studies on “recurrence” do not separate pain coming back from growths coming back.⁴⁸ That is exactly the difference that matters here.

06 · The Bedside Test

If we can touch it, and a shot changes it, it isn’t your uterus

This is the most useful idea in this article. And it costs almost nothing to check.

Your organs are not tender when someone presses on your belly wall. Muscle and fascia are. So if pressing on one exact spot brings your pain back, the pain is coming from the wall.

There is a trick that makes this even clearer. Tighten your stomach muscles, like you are starting a sit-up. That pulls your organs away from the examining finger. If the tenderness gets worse, the problem is in the wall. This is called Carnett’s sign. Doctors described it a hundred years ago. They still do not use it enough.

What the research says

• · In 120 emergency patients with belly pain, 24 were tender on the wall. Only one of those 24 turned out to have a problem inside the abdomen.⁴⁹ A follow-up study of 72 patients with unexplained belly pain and a positive test found they “generated a good deal of investigation and a number of surgical procedures.” And almost none of them had anything serious.⁵⁰
• · The trial that matters. 48 patients got a shot in a tender spot in the belly wall. Half got numbing medicine. Half got salt water. Nobody knew which. Success: 13 of 24 with the numbing medicine. 4 of 24 with salt water. That gap is real (P = 0.007).⁵¹ It proves the response to a belly wall shot is the medicine actually working. It is not a placebo. It is not just the needle. And that is why a shot can tell us the pain is in the wall and not in an organ.

07 · The Usual Suspects

Where the copycats actually live

These are the structures that most often cause pain that got labeled endometriosis. We see them constantly, and the research backs them up.

Two more muscles belong on this list. The iliopsoas runs deep through the front of your hip. The quadratus lumborum sits in your side and low back. Both often cause deep groin, lower belly, and flank pain that people describe as feeling “inside.”

We will be straight about the evidence here. The idea that muscles send pain to distant places is well proven, and has been since 1938.⁶⁶ But the specific maps of where each muscle sends pain come from one source: Travell and Simons’ trigger point manual. That is expert clinical description, not tested research. We use those maps every day, because they work. We are not going to dress them up as something they are not.

08 · Finding the Source

How a fascial map finds what nobody else could

Everything in section 07 is a guess about anatomy. The real question is how to prove which structure is causing the pain in your body. That is what Fascial Mapping is for. And we want to be clear about when it makes sense.

Why a regular scan keeps missing it

An MRI is a photograph of a body lying still. But fascia hurts when it is loaded and pulled. A person lying still in a scanner is in the one position where the painful tissue is not doing the thing that makes it hurt.

That is a big reason so many women with real belly wall or pelvic floor pain get told their imaging is normal. And then get told the pain must be their endometriosis. Because what else could it be?

What a mapping visit actually involves

• · Moving ultrasound, done by the physician. Not a technician taking still pictures. We watch the tissue while you move. Tighten your belly. Bear down. Twist. Arch. Layers that should slide past each other and do not are obvious in motion, and invisible at rest.
• · Pressing with the probe. We press with the ultrasound probe while watching the screen, trying to bring back your exact pain. Not just “that’s tender.” The specific pain you came in describing. When you say “that’s it, that’s the pain,” and we can see which layer the probe is on, the guessing is over.
• · Mapping the wall layer by layer. Skin. Fat. Three layers of side muscle. The six-pack muscle and its sheath. The thin fascia under that, and the lining of the abdomen below it. Plus the nerves crossing through. Pain in the wall and pain behind the wall feel identical to you. They do not look identical on ultrasound.
• · Checking your scars. We map C-section, hysterectomy, and laparoscopy scars on purpose. Where are the layers stuck? Does a nerve run into scar tissue? Is the tender spot in the wall, or deeper?
• · Confirming with a test shot. When mapping finds a likely source, we place a small amount of numbing medicine into that exact layer, watching on ultrasound. That tests the idea. The logic comes from section 06. The precision is what the ultrasound adds.

What you get out of it

A map. An actual list of named structures, ranked, with the confirmed ones marked. That is the product.

And it is what makes step two possible. You cannot choose between a nerve release, a fascia release, pelvic floor therapy, shockwave, and a trip back to your gynecologist until you know what you are aiming at. Most of the women we see have had step two tried over and over. Step one never got done.

A map also tells us when the answer is not fascia. A clean fascial map in a woman with severe period pain, deep pain with sex, and painful bowel movements is useful information. It points back toward the pelvis, and toward a surgeon who specializes in removing endometriosis. And it does that based on something we looked at, not something we assumed.

When the map finds a stuck layer

Sometimes mapping finds a specific adhesion. Two layers that should slide, stuck together. Hydrofascia Release™ is how we treat that. HFR is a fascial hydrodissection. They are the same thing, not two treatments. We use ultrasound to guide fluid into the space between the stuck layers. It is the only way to release a fascial adhesion in real time — watched separating on the screen as it happens, instead of guessed at afterward from how someone feels.

09 · Both At Once

When the endometriosis is real and so is the fascia pain

This is the most common situation of all. It is also where “is it endometriosis or is it muscle?” stops making sense. Usually it is both. And there is a reason why.

Inflammation inside drives lasting pain outside

Nerves from your pelvic organs and nerves from your belly wall, pelvic floor, and low back all feed into the same section of your spinal cord. When an inflamed organ keeps sending signals, those shared spinal cells get turned up. The result is real pain and real tenderness in the muscles. It lasts long after, and separate from, the organ.

• · In an animal study, endometriosis alone caused no pain behavior. A kidney stone alone caused none either. Together, the endometriosis animals showed more stone pain, new pain behaviors specific to the uterus, and much more muscle tenderness. Bigger growths meant more pain, in a straight line.⁶⁷
• · Endometriosis growths grow their own nerve supply.^68,69 And removing them before those nerves develop stops the pain sensitivity from ever setting in.⁷⁰ That is a strong argument for treating this disease early instead of waiting.
• · In humans, women with both kidney stones and painful periods have more of both pains than women with just one. They also have more tenderness in the low back and belly muscles. Treating either condition improved the other. But this does not happen with every pair of organs. It failed for gallstones and kidney stones.⁷¹

High pain sensitivity predicts who surgery will fail

This is the most useful finding in the whole field. And most patients never hear it before they agree to an operation.

• · 239 women were scored before endometriosis surgery, using a questionnaire that measures how turned-up your pain system is. Higher scores before surgery meant worse pain after surgery, even after accounting for how much pain they started with. The authors said it directly. Use this score beforehand to find the people likely to still hurt afterward.⁴¹
• · In a separate study, women who scored above the cutoff were three times as likely to say hormone treatment did not help. And twice as likely to have daily pain.⁷²
• · The same score also predicts when medicine will fail, not just surgery.

To be fair to the other side: this is a questionnaire, not a lab test. And it does not match laboratory measures of pain sensitivity very well. Reported rates in endometriosis run from 11% to 58%, mostly because different studies define it differently. But the surgery finding holds up. That is why we check this before anyone operates, instead of after.

And treating the muscle side works

• · A trial across 11 centers in North America studied 81 women with bladder pain and tender pelvic floor muscles. Half got targeted hands-on muscle therapy. Half got general massage. 59% of the targeted group improved, versus 26%.⁷³ That is a condition treated as an organ problem, improved by treating muscle.
• · 60 women had already had their endometriosis removed. They had been in pain for almost nine years on average. A combined program cut their pain scores from 7.45 to 4.12 in three months. The program was ultrasound-guided trigger point shots, nerve blocks, pelvic floor therapy, and counseling.⁷⁴ It had no control group and only three months of follow-up. Read it against that 30% fake-surgery response. But it is the closest published program to what we actually do.

10 · Medicines Worth Watching

Low-dose naltrexone and GLP-1 drugs: what makes sense, what’s proven

Low-dose naltrexone

At normal doses, naltrexone blocks opioid receptors. Doctors use it in addiction treatment. At very low doses — a small fraction of the usual amount, mixed by a compounding pharmacy — it seems to work a different way. It calms the immune cells in your nervous system that amplify pain. It may also nudge your body into making more of its own natural painkillers.

The reason it is interesting here is the fit, not the proof. Endometriosis pain has a clear nerve-inflammation piece and a turned-up-pain-system piece, as section 09 explained. LDN’s best human evidence comes from other conditions with that same signature. Fibromyalgia most of all, where small trials showed benefit. Inflammatory bowel disease as well. Trials in endometriosis and pelvic pain are early and still running.

Here is what we can say fairly. It is off-label. It needs a compounding pharmacy. It is cheap. And most people tolerate it well, with vivid dreams and broken sleep in the first few weeks being the usual complaints. It is not a replacement for finding the source of the pain. But in the right patient — a high pain-sensitivity score, pain in many places, and a poor response to both hormones and surgery — it is a reasonable thing to try while we do the mechanical work. We will not promise you a success rate. The endometriosis data to quote one do not exist yet.

GLP-1 drugs

There is real reasoning here, and no human endometriosis results to back it up yet.

Body fat is not just storage. It makes estrogen. In a disease that feeds on estrogen, that matters. GLP-1 drugs also lower markers of inflammation throughout the body, partly separate from weight loss.

Put those together, and a drug that lowers fat-made estrogen and body-wide inflammation is an interesting idea in an estrogen-driven, inflammatory disease. That is a hypothesis. It is not a treatment claim. Anyone telling you GLP-1 drugs treat endometriosis is ahead of the research.

Where this gets practical for our patients is the overlap group. Hypermobile women. Women with mast cell symptoms. Women with lipedema and metabolic problems alongside pelvic pain. We do run a physician-directed GLP-1 program for that group, with slow dose increases and monthly labs, because these patients often do badly on standard protocols. That work is described on our FLIP program page, and in Dr. Courseault’s commentary on GLP-1, mast cells, and the hypermobile body.

Two proven things that get skipped

Hormone suppression is still the first medicine for endometriosis. ACOG’s 2026 guideline says clearly that you do not need surgery before starting it.¹⁰ And pelvic floor physical therapy has randomized evidence behind it for pelvic pain with muscle findings.⁷³ Neither one is new. Both are underused. And both should usually be in place before anyone tries something experimental.

11 · Machines and Devices

Shockwave, TECAR, and PEMF: where they fit, and where they don’t

The order matters more than the machine. A shockwave treatment aimed at the wrong structure is a waste of your time and your money. Plenty of clinics sell exactly that. Map first. Confirm with a shot. Then pick the tool. And expect the tool to change as the map changes.

12 · What We Don’t Claim

Red flags, and the mistake we work hardest not to make

This article argues one direction. Pain labeled endometriosis is often fascia. The opposite mistake is just as harmful. And a fascia clinic is exactly the kind of place where it could happen.

Here is what makes us look elsewhere, or send you elsewhere, instead of treating fascia:

• · New pelvic symptoms after menopause. Also bleeding after menopause, losing weight without trying, constant bloating, a belly that keeps getting bigger, feeling full after a few bites, a fixed lump in the pelvis, or symptoms that keep getting worse and are not tied to your cycle. These are ovarian cancer warning signs. They get worked up, not treated.
• · A lump in the belly wall. A positive tenderness test says the problem is in the wall. It does not say what the problem is. Endometriosis in a C-section scar — classically, pain and swelling that come with your period — plus tumors and hidden hernias all present this way.
• · Two uncommon hernias: Spigelian and obturator. Both are often impossible to see or feel. Both can strangle, which is an emergency. And both cause exactly the deep, hard-to-pin-down lower belly or groin pain we see all day. These need imaging, not assumptions.
• · Inflammatory back pain. A form of spinal arthritis can look just like muscle pain in the low back and buttock. In our view it is the most important thing to catch in this group. Warning signs: morning stiffness lasting over 30 minutes, pain that wakes you in the second half of the night, pain that gets better with exercise rather than rest, and buttock pain that switches sides.
• · Fever, unusual discharge, or a mass near an ovary. A pelvic infection is not a fascia problem.
• · Pudendal nerve pain, interstitial cystitis, and pelvic vein problems. All real. All separately diagnosable. All need a different path.

And plainly: some of this we will not be able to fix. Some pain comes from disease that needs a surgeon. Some comes from a nervous system that will take a long time, and a lot of coordinated work, to calm down. We will tell you which one we think you are. And we would rather tell you early than sell you a package.

13 · How We Work

Two steps — and they’re the same two steps for everybody

Step one: find the real source of the pain. Not an area. Not a guess. The exact tissue. That means your history. A real hands-on exam, including the tighten-your-stomach test and an internal pelvic floor check. Moving ultrasound with probe pressure. And targeted numbing shots to confirm.

Step two: find the right tool or tools, and use them in the right order. Hydrofascia Release for a confirmed stuck layer. Nerve hydrodissection for a confirmed pinched nerve. Pelvic floor physical therapy for the pelvic floor. Shockwave, TECAR, or PEMF for a mapped fascia target. Hormone suppression, a surgeon, or both for the disease itself. Medicine for a turned-up nervous system. Metabolic and connective tissue work where that is what is holding you back.

We do specialize in athletes. The approach for everyone else is exactly the same. We say that on purpose, because women with pelvic pain have spent years being handled differently. A pro fighter chasing a title. A teacher who cannot make it through the school day. A nurse on her feet for twelve hours. A grandmother who wants to pick up her grandchild. The stakes are different. The process is identical.

And when it works, we are not quiet about it. Watching a woman who spent nine years being told the pain was in her head walk out after we showed her, on a screen, exactly which layer of her belly wall was causing it — that is the best part of this job.

References

Selected sources

1. Taylor HS, Kotlyar AM, Flores VA. Endometriosis is a chronic systemic disease: clinical challenges and novel innovations. Lancet 2021;397(10276):839–852. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00389-5
2. World Health Organization. Endometriosis fact sheet.
3. Fuldeore MJ, Soliman AM. Prevalence and symptomatic burden of diagnosed endometriosis in the United States. PMID 27820938
4. The role of fibrosis in endometriosis: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2024;30(6). PMID 39067455
5. De Corte P, et al. Time to diagnose endometriosis: current status, challenges and regional characteristics — a systematic literature review. BJOG 2025. PMID 39373298
6. Abbott J, Hawe J, Hunter D, Holmes M, Finn P, Garry R. Laparoscopic excision of endometriosis: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Fertil Steril 2004;82(4):878–884. PMID 15482763
7. Stratton P, Khachikyan I, Sinaii N, Ortiz R, Shah J. Association of chronic pelvic pain and endometriosis with signs of sensitization and myofascial pain. Obstet Gynecol 2015;125(3):719–728. PMID 25730237
8. Becker CM, et al. ESHRE guideline: endometriosis. Hum Reprod Open 2022;2022(2):hoac009. PMID 35350465
9. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Endometriosis: diagnosis and management. NG73, updated 11 November 2024.
10. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Clinical Practice Guideline No. 11: Diagnosis of Endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol 2026;147(3). PMID 41712950. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000006181
11. Nisenblat V, Bossuyt PMM, Farquhar C, Johnson N, Hull ML. Imaging modalities for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016. PMID 26919512
12. Bailey A, et al. Diagnosis of superficial endometriosis on transvaginal ultrasound by visualization of the peritoneum of the pouch of Douglas. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2024. doi:10.1002/uog.27529
13. Nisenblat V, et al. Blood biomarkers for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016. PMID 27132058
14. Guerriero S, Condous G, Van den Bosch T, Valentin L, et al. Systematic approach to sonographic evaluation of the pelvis in women with suspected endometriosis (IDEA consensus). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016;48(3):318–332. PMID 27349699
15. Keckstein J, et al. The #Enzian classification: a comprehensive non-invasive and surgical description system for endometriosis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2021;100(7):1165–1175. PMID 33483970
16. Vercellini P, et al. Association between endometriosis stage, lesion type, patient characteristics and severity of pelvic pain symptoms. Hum Reprod 2007;22(1):266–271. PMID 16936305
17. Ramin-Wright A, Kohl Schwartz AS, et al. Fatigue — a symptom in endometriosis. Hum Reprod 2018;33(8):1459–1465.
18. Is endometriosis staging related to the type and intensity of patients’ complaints? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. PMID 41338448
19. Gibson DA, et al. Pelvic pain correlates with peritoneal macrophage abundance not endometriosis. Reprod Fertil 2021;2(1). doi:10.1530/RAF-20-0072
20. As-Sanie S, Harris RE, Napadow V, et al. Changes in regional gray matter volume in women with chronic pelvic pain: a voxel-based morphometry study. Pain 2012;153(5):1006–1014. PMID 22387096
21. Hugon-Rodin J, Lebègue G, Becourt S, Hamonet C, Gompel A. Gynecologic symptoms and the influence on reproductive life in 386 women with hypermobility type Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2016;11(1):124. PMID 27619482
22. Castori M, et al. Gynecologic and obstetric implications of the joint hypermobility syndrome in 82 Italian patients. Am J Med Genet A 2012;158A(9):2176–2182.
23. Mastoroudes H, et al. Lower urinary tract symptoms in women with benign joint hypermobility syndrome: a case–control study. Int Urogynecol J 2013;24(9):1553–1558. PMID 23436036
24. Lack of association of joint hypermobility with urinary incontinence subtypes and pelvic organ prolapse. PMID 24905778
25. Nazemi S, Shapiro K, Nagpal S, Rosenblum N, Brucker B. Pelvic organ prolapse in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. 2023. PMID 36875296
26. Malfait F, et al. The 2017 international classification of the Ehlers–Danlos syndromes. Am J Med Genet C 2017;175(1):8–26. PMID 28306229
27. Imbroane MR, Kim H, Akesson C, Richards EG. Assessing the risk of gynecologic and obstetric diagnoses in patients with Ehlers–Danlos syndromes. J Womens Health 2026. doi:10.1177/15409996261418483
28. McIntosh LJ, Mallett VT, Frahm JD, Richardson DA, Evans MI. Gynecologic disorders in women with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. J Soc Gynecol Investig 1995;2(3):559–564. PMID 9420859
29. Defining the chronic complexities of hEDS and HSD: a global survey. J Clin Med 2025;14(16):5636. PMID 40869462
30. Zoppi N, et al. Dermal fibroblast-to-myofibroblast transition sustained by αvβ3 integrin–ILK–Snail1/Slug signaling is a common feature for hEDS and HSD. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis 2018;1864(4):1010–1023. PMID 29309923
31. Ritelli M, et al. Bridging the diagnostic gap for hEDS and HSD: evidence of a common ECM fragmentation pattern in patient plasma as a potential biomarker. Am J Med Genet A 2025. PMID 39225014
32. Fede C, et al. Sensitivity of the fasciae to sex hormone levels: modulation of collagen-I, collagen-III and fibrillin production. PLoS One 2019;14(9):e0223195.
33. Anaf V, Chapron C, El Nakadi I, et al. Pain, mast cells, and nerves in peritoneal, ovarian, and deep infiltrating endometriosis. Fertil Steril 2006;86(5):1336–1343. PMID 17007852
34. Lack of evidence for increased mast cell activation syndrome prevalence in POTS and/or hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. PMID 42595300. See also: MCAS is not associated with hEDS and/or POTS: a multicenter retrospective review, J Allergy Clin Immunol 2025; and Prevalence of mast cell activation disorders and hereditary alpha tryptasemia among patients with POTS and EDS: a systematic review, Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2025.
35. Kohn A, Chang C. The relationship between hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, and mast cell activation syndrome. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2020;58(3):273–297. PMID 31267471 (narrative review)
36. The endometriosis–POTS connection: a retrospective analysis. Auton Neurosci 2026. PMID 42641290
37. Boris JR, et al. The long-term POTS outcomes survey — gynecologic findings. Obstet Gynecol Int 2025;2025:8872884.
38. Nociplastic pain in endometriosis: a scoping review. PMID 39768444
39. Di Stefano G, Celletti C, Baron R, et al. Central sensitization as the mechanism underlying pain in joint hypermobility syndrome / Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, hypermobility type. Eur J Pain 2016;20(8). PMID 26919608
40. Linking central sensitization to multisystemic manifestations in hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Front Pain Res 2026. PMID 42454246
41. Orr NL, et al. Association of Central Sensitization Inventory scores with pain outcomes after endometriosis surgery. JAMA Netw Open 2023;6(2):e230780. PMID 36848090
42. Multidimensional evaluation of myofascial pelvic pain and other comorbidities in endometriosis patients. J Clin Med 2025;14(10):3455. PMID 40429450
43. Meister MR, et al. Pelvic floor myofascial pain severity and pelvic floor disorder symptom bother: is there a correlation? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019;221(3):235.e1–235.e15. PMID 31319079
44. Meister MR, Sutcliffe S, Badu A, Ghetti C, Lowder JL. Physical examination techniques for the assessment of pelvic floor myofascial pain: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018. PMID 29959930
45. Srinivasan R, Greenbaum DS. Chronic abdominal wall pain: a frequently overlooked problem. Am J Gastroenterol 2002;97(4):824–830. PMID 12003414
46. Chronic abdominal wall pain misdiagnosed as functional abdominal pain. PMID 19555786
47. Abbott JA, Hawe J, Clayton RD, Garry R. The effects and effectiveness of laparoscopic excision of endometriosis: a prospective study with 2–5 year follow-up. Hum Reprod 2003;18(9):1922–1927. PMID 12923150
48. Guo SW. Recurrence of endometriosis and its control. Hum Reprod Update 2009;15(4):441–461. PMID 19279046
49. Thomson H, Francis DM. Abdominal-wall tenderness: a useful sign in the acute abdomen. Lancet 1977. PMID 72957
50. Abdominal wall tenderness: a useful sign in chronic abdominal pain. Br J Surg 1991;78(2):223–225. PMID 1826626
51. Boelens OB, Scheltinga MR, Houterman S, Roumen RM. Randomized clinical trial of trigger point infiltration with lidocaine to diagnose anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome. Br J Surg 2013;100(2):217–221. PMID 23180371
52. Verhagen T, Loos MJA, Mulders LGM, Scheltinga MRM, Roumen RMH. A step-up therapeutic regimen for chronic post-Pfannenstiel pain syndrome. 2019. PMID 30445375
53. Loos MJA, Scheltinga MRM, Mulders LGM, Roumen RMH. The Pfannenstiel incision as a source of chronic pain. Obstet Gynecol 2008;111(4):839–846. PMID 18378742
54. Weibel S, Neubert K, Jelting Y, et al. Incidence and severity of chronic pain after caesarean section: a systematic review with meta-analysis. 2016. PMID 27635953
55. Nikolajsen L, Sørensen HC, Jensen TS, Kehlet H. Chronic pain following caesarean section. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2004;48(1):111–116. PMID 14674981
56. Loos MJA, Scheltinga MRM, Roumen RMH. Surgical management of inguinal neuralgia after a low transverse Pfannenstiel incision. Ann Surg 2008;248(5):880–885. PMID 18948818
57. Meister MR, Sutcliffe S, Ghetti C, et al. Development of a standardized, reproducible screening examination for assessment of pelvic floor myofascial pain. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019;220:255.e1–9. PMID 30527941
58. Ultrasonographic identification of pelvic floor myofascial trigger points and their correlation with clinical symptoms in patients with pelvic floor myofascial pain. PMID 42582432
59. Randhawa S, Garvin G, Roth M, Wozniak A, Miller T. Maigne syndrome — a potentially treatable yet underdiagnosed cause of low back pain: a review. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2022. PMID 34151827
60. Maigne R. Low back pain of thoracolumbar origin. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1980;61(9):389–395. PMID 6448030
61. Aoun F, et al. Thoracolumbar junction syndrome as a cause of chronic testicular pain. Prog Urol 2020. PMID 31980366
62. Pseudoappendicitis: abdominal pain arising from thoracic spine dysfunction. PMID 27651405
63. Schilder A, Hoheisel U, Magerl W, Benrath J, Klein T, Treede RD. Sensory findings after stimulation of the thoracolumbar fascia with hypertonic saline suggest its contribution to low back pain. Pain 2014. PMID 24076047
64. Weinkauf B, Deising S, Obreja O, Hoheisel U, Mense S, Schmelz M, Rukwied R. Comparison of nerve growth factor-induced sensitization pattern in lumbar and tibial muscle and fascia. Muscle Nerve 2015;52:265–272. PMID 25521275
65. Hoheisel U, Taguchi T, Treede RD, Mense S. Nociceptive input from the rat thoracolumbar fascia to lumbar dorsal horn neurones. Eur J Pain 2011;15:810–815. PMID 21330175
66. Kellgren JH. Referred pains from muscle. BMJ 1938;1(4023):325–327. PMID 20781237
67. Giamberardino MA, Berkley KJ, Affaitati G, et al. Influence of endometriosis on pain behaviors and muscle hyperalgesia induced by a ureteral calculosis in female rats. Pain 2002;95(3):247–257. PMID 11839424
68. Berkley KJ, Cason A, Jacobs H, Bradshaw H, Wood E. Vaginal hyperalgesia in a rat model of endometriosis. Neurosci Lett 2001;306(3):185–188. PMID 11406326
69. Berkley KJ, Dmitrieva N, Curtis KS, Papka RE. Innervation of ectopic endometrium in a rat model of endometriosis. PNAS 2004;101(30):11094–11098. PMID 15256593
70. Sprouted innervation into uterine transplants contributes to the development of hyperalgesia in a rat model of endometriosis. PMID 22363725
71. Viscero-visceral hyperalgesia: characterization in different clinical models. PMID 20638177
72. Orr NL, Wahl KJ, Lisonek M, et al. Central Sensitization Inventory in endometriosis. Pain 2022. PMID 34030173
73. FitzGerald MP, et al. Randomized multicenter clinical trial of myofascial physical therapy in women with interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome and pelvic floor tenderness. J Urol 2012. PMID 22503015
74. A comprehensive treatment protocol for endometriosis patients decreases pain and improves function. Int J Womens Health 2023. PMID 36713131
75. Entrapped by pain: endometriosis affecting somatic nerves. PMID 38735767